The High Court of Delhi, at the stage of dictation, disposed of the appeal as not pressed by the appellant, thereby confirming the impugned order dated 20.03.2017.
Appeal disposed of as not pressed; impugned order of 20.03.2017 stands.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
PARDEEP KUMAR ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Manish, Advocate with Mr. Harit Chhabra, Advocate.
versus
RAJINDER KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 31.05.2017
After arguments, and at the stage of dictation, counsel for the
appellant in the presence of the appellant who is present in Court, states that
appeal be disposed of as not pressed. Ordered accordingly. The impugned
order 20.3.2017 will therefore stand.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
MAY 31, 2017 Ne
Pardeep Kumar
Rajinder Kumar Aggarwal
Valmiki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
