Dismissed
Mohd Firozuddin v. Mohd Ainuddin
Delhi HCFAO/244/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The appellant sought withdrawal of the appeal as the case was argued and at the stage of dictation but was not pressed. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of as not pressed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~15
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- FAO 244/2017 & CM Nos. 20253-55/2017 MOHD FIROZUDDIN ..... Appellant
¶4
Through: Mohd. Iqbal, Adv. versus MOHD AINUDDIN ..... Respondent Through
¶5
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 30.05.2017
¶6
After arguments, and at the stage of dictation of the judgment, counsel
¶7
for the appellant states that the appeal be disposed of as not pressed. Ordered accordingly.
¶8
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
¶9
MAY 30, 2017 ib
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Mohd Firozuddin
- respondent
Mohd Ainnuddin
Coram
AI extract
Valmikiji Mehta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court