North Dmc v. M/S a R Builders
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order setting aside an impugned order due to consent, clarifying restrictions on future arguments, and restoring a matter to the District and Sessions Judge for disposal as objection petition.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order dated 2.2.2016 set aside; matter restored to District and Sessions Judge for disposal.
What the court decided
$~3
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- FAO 312/2016 & CM No. 24833/2016(stay)
NORTH DMC ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Adv. versus M/S A R BUILDERS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Garg and Mr. Abhimanyu Goel, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 29.05.2017
- With consent the impugned order dated 2.2.2016 is set aside, however it is clarified that appellant will not get more than three opportunities to complete arguments, and failing which the arguments of the present appellant will be taken as closed and the court below can decide the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in accordance with the arguments of the present respondent and the record.
- Parties to appear before the District and Sessions Judge, Rohini Courts, Delhi on 13.7.2017 and the District and Sessions Judge will mark the objection petition for disposal to a competent court in accordance with law, and which objection petition is restored by setting aside the impugned
order dated 2.2.2016 by today’s order of this Court.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
Parties & counsel
- appellant
NORTH DMC
- respondent
M/S A R BUILDERS
Coram
Valmiki J. Mehta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court