Sap Se v. Saptac & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court accepted a compromise settlement between the plaintiff and defendants reducing the parties to the first two, recorded the consent terms as lawful, and decreed the suit and applications accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Suit and applications decreed in accordance with the consent terms; parties held bound by them.
What the court decided
9 $~
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CS(OS) 939/2015 & I.As. 7032/2015, 7035/2015, 11408/2015 AND 14639/2015
SAP SE ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ranjan Narula, Advocate with Ms. Astha Joshi, Advocate.
versus
SAPTAC & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Kumar Kaushik, Advocate with defendant No.2 in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 11.09.2017
At the outset, learned counsel for plaintiff wishes to delete the defendants No.3 and 4.
Accordingly, defendants No.3 and 4 are deleted from the array of parties.
Today in Court, learned counsel for parties have handed over Consent Terms/Memorandum of Settlement entered into between the plaintiff and defendants No.1 and 2. The same is taken on record.
Coram
Manmohan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court