The plaintiff and defendants submitted that the suit should be disposed of based on a Settlement Agreement executed on May 15, 2017, which had already been acted upon by the parties.
Suit disposed of in terms of Settlement Agreement of 15th May, 2017. Court fee refunded under Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
M/S GAUTAM BROTHERS ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vansh Khanna, Advocate
versus
M/S SHAILI PARADIGM INFRATECH (P) LTD & ORS
.....Defendants Through: Mr. Gautam Bajaj, Advocate for defendants No.1 to 3
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 19.07.2017
Both sides submit that this suit be disposed of in terms of Settlement Agreement of 15th May, 2017 as the aforesaid Settlement Agreement has been already acted upon.
In view of aforesaid, this suit stands disposed of in terms of aforesaid Settlement Agreement.
Court fee be refunded to plaintiff in terms of provision of Section 16-A of The Court Fees Act .
SUNIL GAUR, J
JULY 19, 2017 s
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit be disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 15th May, 2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
