The High Court of Delhi dismissed the impugned order and quashed FIR No.330/2010 registered under Sections 498A/34 IPC. The settlement between parties and divorce by mutual consent justified this decision.
Quashed FIR No.330/2010 registered under Sections 498A/34 IPC and disposed of incidental proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~91
RAMPAL SHOKEN & ORS ..... Petitioners Through : Mr.P.R.Chatterji, Advocate along with petitioners in person.
versus
STATE &ANR ..... Respondents Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with ASI Tejram, PS Najafgarh. Mr.Gulab Singh, Advocate for the complainant along with complainant in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 16.02.2017
CRL.M.A.No.2785/2017 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.A.No.2821/2017 (Delay)
CRL.M.C. 649/2017 & CRL.M.A.No.2786/2017 (Stay)
CRL.M.C. 649/2017
page 1 of 2
S.P.GARG, J
FEBRUARY 16, 2017 / tr
page 2 of 2
CRL.M.C. 649/2017
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an FIR registered under Sections 498A/34 IPC should be quashed after an amicable settlement and divorce by mutual consent.
Whether condonation of delay is warranted for refiling the petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.P.Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
