The court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/406 IPC after finding that the marital dispute was settled amicably, divorce by mutual consent was granted, and the remaining settlement amount was paid to the complainant.
FIR No.96/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406 IPC at PS Maurya Enclave and all proceedings arising therefrom were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
KARTIKESHAN MUDALIYAR & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through : Mr.Vikramjit Saini, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Kamal K.Ghei, APP with Insp.I.Singh, PS Maurya Enclave. Mr.Gautam Kumar, Advocate for the complainant along with complainant in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 16.02.2017
page 1 of 2
CRL.M.C. 2295/2016
free consent and she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question. Divorce by mutual consent has already been granted. Pursuant to the settlement, remaining amount of ` 4 lacs by way of fixed deposit bearing account No.015413008340 dated 24.05.2016 drawn on ICICI Bank in the name of Ms.Yasashvi Mudaliyar (Minor) has been given to the complainant in the Court today. Copy of which has been placed on record.
S.P.GARG, J
FEBRUARY 16, 2017 / tr
page 2 of 2
CRL.M.C. 2295/2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR registered under Sections 498A/406 IPC should be quashed after the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably and divorce by mutual consent has been granted.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
KARTIKESHAN MUDALIYAR & ORS
STATE & ORS
S.P.GARG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
