The criminal miscellaneous cases and appeals filed by petitioners challenging non-bailable warrants were dismissed as infructuous. The court noted that the petitioners had already been convicted in a State case under Section 23 of the NDPS Act on 29.7.2017, rendering the pending appeals of no practical consequence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
versus
NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
..... Respondent
Through Mr. Rajesh Manchanda, Secial P.P. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
O R D E R % 12.12.2017
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner and on behalf of the respondent that the present petition has become infructuous inasmuch as the petitioners convicted vide impugned order dated 19.1.2015 of the Special Judge NDPS, New Delhi whereby nonbailable warrants were issued against the petitioners. It has been submitted on behalf of both the respondent that both the petitioners have since been convicted on 29.7.2017 in State Case No.36/11 under Section 23 of the NDPS Act. In view thereof the submissions made on behalf of the either side, the Crl.M.C. No. 271 and Crl.M.A. No. 1072/2015 have become infructuous and are dismissed as such.
ANU MALHOTRA, J
DECEMBER 12, 2017 aj
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rafiq Ahmad Sheikh & Anr.
Narcotics Control Bureau
Anu Malhotra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
