The High Court of Delhi granted the petitioner's permission to withdraw the writ petition after being directed to be released on parole by the competent court and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
PAWAN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Dhan Mohan with Ms.Tanu and Ms. Jayanti, Advocates
versus
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:Mr.R.S.Kundu, ASC with Mr.Ankit Kumar Gulia, Advocate for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR O R D E R % 21.04.2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition as the petitioner has already been directed to be released on parole by the competent court.
Permission is granted.
The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
APRIL 21, 2017 Bisht
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present writ petition.
PAWAN KUMAR
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
