Disposed

Yash Pal Singhal & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Delhi HC21 Apr 2017W.P.(CRL)/1160/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought protection from assault by respondents. Court directed continuation of police protection, vigil on premises, and sharing mobile numbers of police officers for emergency contact and immediate assistance.

What did the court decide?

Continuation of police protection including vigil on residence, provision of mobile numbers of two police officers for emergencies, and immediate action against harassment.

Yash Pal Singhal & Ors. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors. — Delhi HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~62

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 1160/2017

¶4

YASH PAL SINGHAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Sarthak Maggon, Adv. for petitioners with petitioner Nos.1 & 3 in person.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao ASC with SI Rajesh Kumar from PS B.K.Road.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR O R D E R % 21.04.2017

¶9

The petitioners, by the aforesaid petition, have sought protection from respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 against the actions of respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6 who are lawyers practising in Delhi and a security guard.

¶10

Several instances have been referred to in the petition when the petitioners were assaulted and injured. It has been submitted on behalf the petitioners that despite their making great efforts to register complaints against respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6, it is not being done because of the respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6 wielding undue influence with the government officials.

¶11

Mr.Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel was asked by this Court to seek instructions in the matter.

¶12

Mr.Lao submits that pursuant to the complaint made by the petitioners, two beat constables have been deputed in the building in which the petitioners reside. The beat constables have been instructed to keep a vigil on the residence of the petitioners and make note of the ingress and egress of unknown faces in their houses and other flats in the building. The second officer of the concerned police station is present here.

¶13

Let the protection which has been afforded to the petitioners be continued for sometime till the dispute between the parties is settled in an amicable way.

¶14

The petitioners shall be provided mobile telephone numbers of at least two police officers, including SHO of the concerned police station. In case of any emergency call, it would be expected of the police officers of the concerned police station to immediately provide help to the petitioners by rushing to their place. In case, the police finds that any one of the respondents or others acting on their behalf are trying to harass the petitioners, necessary action would be taken forthwith.

¶15

With this observation, the petition is disposed of.

¶16

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J

¶17

APRIL 21, 2017 mb

Yash Pal Singhal & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yash Pal Singhal & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Souri Charan Sahoo Mahant @ Oriya Baba Vs State of Delhi & Ors.

Amar Singh Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Sateshwar Prasad Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Diksha Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Jaivir Gopal Singh Vs State, NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Deepa Bhatia Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Hem Singh @ Hemu Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Chaman Chhokar Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Amar Singh Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Jay Krishna Pandey & Ors. Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.

Daya Shanker Aggarwal Vs Sneh Aggarwal & Anr.

Sumer Singh Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Pappu Singh Vs State

Sunil Kumar Vs State (Nct of Delhi)