Nilkamal Bito Storage Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Brahma Auto Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.PET.…
What did the court decide?
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~C-42
NILKAMAL BITO STORAGE SYSTEMS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. (appearance not given), Adv.
versus
BRAHMA AUTO INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Nishit Kush, with Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Baliyan, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R % 13.09.2017
CO.PET. 312/2015 & CA No. 1504/2017
The learned counsel for the respondent states that vide order dated 24th July, 2017, though the petition was admitted but the publication of the citation and appointment of Provisional Liquidator was deferred and an opportunity was given to the respondent company to pay the amount due to the petitioner with interest @ 8% per annum with effect from 29th March, 2015.
The learned counsel for the respondent company has moved an application (CA No.1504/2017) with a prayer for condonation of delay of 12 days in compliance of order dated 24th July, 2017 and that they have handed over a demand draft of Rs.6,18,511/- (bearing no. 125539, dated 1.9.2017, drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce, Sector-17, Gurugram Branch) in full and final settlement in respect of all claims. The delay is condoned.
Learned counsel for the petitioner accepts the said amount in full and final settlement.
In view of above, Co.Pet. No.312/2015 stands dismissed as satisfied.
YOGESH KHANNA, J
SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 srb
NILKAMAL BITO STORAGE SYSTEMS PVT LTD
BRAHMA AUTO INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court