This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~C-13
NARINDER KUMAR BATHIJA ..... Petitioner Through : None. versus
BIGJO'S ESTSTES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Sandeep, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R % 12.09.2017
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that the entire dues of the petitioner company has been paid and nothing remains due against the respondent company. Mr. Vivek Vedi, Authorised Representative of the respondent also submits the same thing.
Since no-one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the petition stands dismissed in default.
YOGESH KHANNA, J
SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 srb
Narinder Kumar Bathija
Bigjo's Estates Limited
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
