Arun Kumar Jain v. the State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the petition stating the matter was settled; Associated Affidavit matter withdrawn; hearing date cancelled.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of petition allowed; associated CA 7860/2017 allowed; hearing date cancelled.
What the court decided
$~O-6
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TEST.CAS. 4/2015 ARUN KUMAR JAIN ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Peeyoosh Kalra, Adv. with Ms.Sona Babbar, Adv. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Ruby Singh Ahuja, Mr.Shravan Sahny and Mr.Nakul Gandhi, Advs.for R-2 and 4 Mr.Rakesh Raushan, Adv. along with Pankaj Jain Mr.Rajiv Bahl, Adv. for LR No.5Priya Jain
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R % 06.09.2017 TEST.CAS. 4/2015, IA No. 9424/2017, 7860/2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition as the matter has been settled as per his instructions received from his client. Learned counsel in CA No.9424/2017 appearing for the beneficiary under the Will says that he has no objection if the petition is allowed to be withdrawn. Hence CA No.7860 stands allowed.
Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterates – CA No.7860/2017 is duly supported by an affidavit duly authenticated by notary public in western Australia and the counsel is authorised to make above statement.
The date already fixed 26.09.2017 stands cancelled.
YOGESH KHANNA, J
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ARUN KUMAR JAIN
- respondent
THE STATE
Coram
YOGESH KHANNA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court