Disposed
Nitin Jain v. Pallavi Jain
Delhi HCCM(M)/996/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner furnished Master proof of deposit of costs. The Court confirmed the deposit and noted that the petition had already been dismissed earlier; no further orders were necessary.
What did the court decide?
Confirmation of deposit of costs; no further order necessary as petition already dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~39
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CM(M) 996/2017
¶4
NITIN JAIN ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv.
¶6
Versus
¶7
PALLAVI JAIN ..... Respondent Through: None.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
¶10
O R D E R
¶11
% 14.09.2017
¶12
- This order is in continuation of the earlier order dated 12th September, 2017.
¶13
- The counsel for the petitioner has furnished to the Court Master proof of deposit of costs of Rs.25,000/- with the Delhi High Court Bar Association Lawyers’ Social Security and Welfare Fund, New Delhi.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
NITIN JAIN
- respondent
PALLAVI JAIN
Coram
AI extract
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court