Petitioner sought to withdraw his miscellaneous appeal before the DRAT in light of a filed review application before the DRT. The High Court disposed of the writ petition granting liberty to pursue remedies before the lowerDRAT/DRT.
Petition disposed along with pending application; liberty granted to seek remedies before DRAT/DRT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
Through: Mr. Atul T.N., Advocate along with Mr. Sagar Pathak and Mr. Harsh Raghuvanshi, Advocates.
FEDERAL BANK AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Joby P. Varghese, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R
not propose to pursue the present petition any further. Instead, the petitioner proposes to appear before the DRAT tomorrow i.e 12.09.2017 and seek leave to withdraw the pending appeal so as to follow up the review application. 3. In view of the submissions made hereinabove, the present petition is disposed of along with the pending application with liberty granted to the petitioner to seek its remedies before the learned DRAT/DRT, in accordance with law.
HIMA KOHLI, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 ss
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 7958/2017
Vinod Popli
Federal Bank and Ors.
Hima Kohli
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
