Rustam v. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL…
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
35# $~
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 76/2017
RUSTAM ..... Petitioner
Represented by: Mr. Ashok Babu and Mr. Vishal Chaudhary, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with Inspector Sanwar Mal, PS Khajuri Khas.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
- O R D E R
- % 16.01.2017
Crl. M.A. No. 837/2017 (Exemption)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the ground of birth of a new born baby is sufficient to extend interim bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rustam
- respondent
The State (NCT of Delhi)
Coram
Mukta Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court