Order on anticipatory bail application under Cr.P.C. No. 2030/2017. Single judge held that despite reliance on bail orders for others, petitioner's alleged gang leadership role and nature of injuries warranted dismissal of the application.
No relief granted; application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32.
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ranvir Vats, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP with SI Dinesh, PS Ranhola
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
O R D E R % 06.02.2017
Crl. M.A. No. 2030/2017
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.
BAIL APPLN. 225/2017
The petitioner has preferred the present anticipatory bail application apprehending arrest in case FIR 444/2016 u/s 341/308/506/34 IPC registered at PS Ranhola. The submission of counsel for the petitioner is that the victim is himself a bad character of the area and there are several cases pending against him.
A perusal of the FIR shows that the complainant has alleged that he was attacked by the petitioner along with 4-5 of his accomplice.
Mr. Katyal submits that the injury suffered by the victim are reported to be grievous. Proceedings under Section 82 Cr PC have also been initiated Reliance has been placed by counsel for the petitioner to orders granting bail to the other accused. However, it is noticed that the said orders are in respect of regular bail. Moreover, the petitioner is stated to be the leader of the team/ gang which had attacked the victim.
In these circumstances, I am not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioner. Dismissed.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
FEBRUARY 06, 2017 sr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioner apprehending arrest under Sections 341/308/506/34 IPC.
Whether petitioner's leadership role and grievous injury allegations justify refusal of relief.
5 provisions across 2 enactments
SUNNY MISHRA
STATE
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
