The petitioner withdrew this writ petition claiming it is infructuous. The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.
Order for withdrawal of the petition and dismissal of the same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
NIPPUN GUPTA ..... Petitioner
Through Ms. Bindu Das, Advocate.
versus
PHOENIX ARC PRIVATE LTD. ..... Respondent Through None
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R % 08.11.2017
Ms. Bindu Das, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition on her assertion that the same has been rendered infructuous.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed off accordingly. Pending application also stands disposed off.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 08, 2017 rs
Nipun Gupta
Phoenix Arc Private Ltd.
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
