The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition and stay application as withdrawn by the petitioner. The court noted a pending related appeal and expected the appellate tribunal to dispose of it expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
GOPAL SINGH HANOT ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr R.S. Rathi and Ms Kusum, Advs. versus UCO BANK AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Jai Mohan, Adv for R-1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R
% 08.11.2017
After detailed arguments, Mr R.S. Rathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
The petition along with the pending application is dismissed as withdrawn.
However, it has been brought to our notice that the subject appeal being Appeal No.4/2017 is next listed before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) on 06.12.2017.
In view of the above, it is hoped and expected that learned DRAT shall dispose off the said appeal expeditiously in accordance with law.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 08, 2017/bg
Gopal Singh Hanot
UCO Bank
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
