In a writ petition regarding unissued GST refund interest, the Court noted the refund was issued but interest remained pending. The Court directed the Respondent to decide on interest within eight weeks.
Direction to pass an order regarding interest payable within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12.
Through Mr. A.K. Babbar & Mr. Surendra Kumar, Advocates.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR.
..... Respondents Through Mr. Manmeet Singh Arora, Advocate for GNCTD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
% 22.11.2017
It is stated by the counsel for the respondents that refund has been issued. Counsel for the petitioner accepts that the refund has been issued. However, he states that interest has not been paid presumably on the ground that the petitioner has submitted physical C forms at a belated stage. The respondents would pass an order relating to interest payable to the petitioner, if any, within a period of eight weeks from today and in case the petitioner is aggrieved, he will be at liberty to challenge the said order in accordance with law.
Recording the above, the writ petition is disposed of.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
NOVEMBER 22, 2017/VKR
M/s Pacific Agencies
Commissioner of Delhi Value Added Tax
Sanjiv Khanna
Prathiba M. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
