Petitioner sought permission to withdraw writ petition. High Court dismissed as withdrawn, disposed of miscellaneous application as infructuous.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted.; Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.; Miscellaneous application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
TARUN KHANNA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dikshant Khanna, Advocate. versus
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION) & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda and Mr. Anand K. Chaudhuri, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R
% 21.11.2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
NOVEMBER 21, 2017/ dk
TARUN KHANNA
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION)
SANJIV KHANNA
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
