Petitioner challenged sanction for prosecution granted by Chief Secretary under Prevention of Corruption Act 1988. Court held matter academic as petitioner had superannuated, rendering sanction unnecessary, and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
MOHAN SINGH MEENA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr K. C. Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal and Mr Amit Prakash Shahi, Advocates.
versus
LT. GOVERNER OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Sanjoy Ghose and Ms Urvi Mohan, Advocates for GNCTD. Inspector Parveen, Anti Corruption Branch.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 08.09.2017
Government of NCT including for years 1996-1999. It is stated that special audit had brought out certain allegations.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SEPTEMBER 08, 2017 RK
Mohan Singh Meena
Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
