Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition and applications as withdrawn. No substantive legal question was adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AKHIL DILLI PRATHMIK SHIKSHAK SANGH (REGD.) ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Adv.
versus
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mahamaya Chatterjee, Adv. for GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 06.09.2017
Mr. Ranjit Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition and applications.
This writ petition and applications are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
SEPTEMBER 06, 2017 /pmc
AKHIL DILLI PRATHMIK SHIKSHAK SANGH (REGD.)
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
CI Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
