Writ petition for mandamus directing CAG to audit airport accounts and for legislative direction treated as representation to respondent. No merit expressed.
represents as representation; no other relief granted
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C)No.6827/2016
| % Date o |
f decision : 6thSeptember, 2017 |
|---|---|
| SUBODH JAIN Through : versus |
..... Petitioner Mr. Keshav Mohan, Mr. Rishi Awasthi and Ms. Anindita Barman, Advs. |
| UNION OF INDIA & ORS | ..... Respondents |
| Through : | Ms. Suparna Srivastava, Standing Counsel for UOI. Mr. Digvijay Rai, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Sarojanand Jha, Mr. Yash Srivastava and Mr. Pratap Singh, Advs. for R-3. Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Meenakshi Chatterjee and Mr. Akshay Sahni, Advs. for R-4. |
| Ms. Eshita Baruah, Adv. for | |
| CORAM: | Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for CAG/R-5. |
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
W.P.(C)No.6827/2016 Page 1 of 2
accounts for conducting a proper and meaningful audit of the accounts of Delhi International Airport Ltd. (respondent no.3 herein) and Mumbai International Airport Ltd. (respondent no.4 herein).
Dasti to parties.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
SEPTEMBER 06, 2017 aj
W.P.(C)No.6827/2016 Page 2 of 2
Subodh Jain
Union of India
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
