The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition praying for payment from the Advocates Welfare Fund by directing an ad-hoc committee to examine the petition and disburse urgent funds if required.
The ad-hoc committee was directed to examine the petition and disburse urgent funds if required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
SHIV SHANKER YADAV ..... Petitioner
Through Ms
versus
BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI & ANR
Respondents Through Mr Ashish Tiwari, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 12.09.2017
The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia , praying that the respondents be directed to pay certain amount from the Advocates Welfare Fund.
The present petition is disposed of by directing the ad-hoc committee to examine the contents of the said petition and, disburse urgent funds, if required.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 pkv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHIV SHANKER YADAV
BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
