Dismissed
Nurul Imam & Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/7117/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
..... Petitioners
Through None.
versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
..... Respondents Through Ms.Himani Kaushik for Mr. Sunil Dutt Salwan, Advocate for DDA. Ms.Sweety Singh, Advocate for R-6.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 11.07.2017
Learned counsel for respondent no.5 submits that demarcation up to 90% has already been carried out by the concerned SDM and the balance 10% will be completed by the end of the month. This statement is taken on record.
Since none has appeared for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed in default as also for non-prosecution; either this petition has become infructuous.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JULY 11, 2017 ndn
Nurul Imam & Ors.
State of Haryana & Ors.
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court