This court directed DUSIB and GNCTD to provide alternate allotments to 15 petitioners within six months for land not consumed by DMRC, while fencing the specific area to prevent re-encroachment.
The respondent was directed to make alternate allotments for the petitioners within six months and to fence the area to prevent re-encroachment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signing Date:16.10.2024 16:52:42 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
ORDER 08.09.2017
%
were, however, not made alternate allotments.
VIP1N6ANGHI, J
JAYANT NATH, J
SEPTEMBER 08, 2017
B.S. Rohella
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioners who were paid compensation for encroached land are entitled to alternate allotment after the land was returned by DUSIB.
Whether the unutilized land cleared for a metro project should be re-encroached.
B.S. Rohella and others
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
VIPIN SINGHANGHI
JAYANT NATH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
