The High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn upon the petitioner's affidavit expressing lack of desire to pursue the matter, based on a prior order regarding the sole petitioner's statement.
Application for withdrawal allowed; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20.
RAJAN LAL & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through Mr. Sagar Kothari, Advocate.
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, ASC for respondent No. 1-GNCTD.
Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
%
O R D E R 01.02.2017
CM No. 2564/2017
This is an application by the sole petitioner in view of the statement made by the petitioner No. 2 as recorded in the order dated 11th July, 2016 for withdrawal of the writ petition. Rajan Lal, the petitioner has also filed an affidavit that he does not want to pursue the present writ petition. The application is allowed and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
FEBRUARY 01, 2017 VKR
RAJAN LAL & ANR.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
