Petitioner withdrew the writ petition. The court allowed the application for withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Application for withdrawal allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19.
NARENDER KUAMR JAIN ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Sagar Kothari, Advocate.
versus
THE REGISTRAR, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, ASC for respondent No. 1-GNCTD.
Ms. Sneh Lata, Advocate for Mr. Kamal Bansal, Advocate for respondent No. -2-Jain Cooperative Bank Limited.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
%
O R D E R 01.02.2017
CM No. 2565/2017
This is an application for withdrawal of the writ petition duly supported by an affidavit of the petitioner. As the petitioner does not want to pursue the present writ petition, the application is allowed and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
FEBRUARY 01, 2017 VKR
NARENDER KUAMR JAIN
THE REGISTRAR, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, DELHI
JAIN COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
