The petitioner did not appear in person or through an advocate. The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution on 09.02.2017.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SOCIETY FOR VALUES AND ETHICS IN EDUCATION THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT ... Petitioner Through: None
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ... Respondents Through: Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for the Respondent No.1. Mr Maninder Singh, ASG with Mr K.K. Rai, Sr Advocate and Mr Manoj R. Sinha, Advs. for the Respondent No.2. Mr Apoorv Kurup with Mr Aeboxi Patro and Mr Rohit Rathi, Advs for the Respondent No.3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
%
O R D E R 09.02.2017
Nobody appears for the petitioner. The writ petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
FEBRUARY 09, 2017 dutt
SOCIETY FOR VALUES AND ETHICS IN EDUCATION THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT
UNION OF INDIA
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
