Petitioner-pursuing a writ petition in person submitted that the respondent would demit office on 03.04.2017 and thus no useful purpose would be served in continuing the petition; the High Court of Delhi appreciated this and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C.S.KALRA
... Petitioner
Through: Petitioner-in-person
versus
THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ... Respondents Through: Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for the Respondent No.1. Mr Maninder Singh, ASG with Mr K.K. Rai, Sr Advocate and Mr Manoj R. Sinha, Advs. for the Respondent No.2. Mr Apoorv Kurup with Mr Aeboxi Patro and Mr Rohit Rathi, Advs for the Respondent No.3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
O R D E R
%
09.02.2017
Mr Kalra, who has been pursuing this petition-in-person very diligently, submits that the respondent No.3 is to, in any event, demit office on 03.04.2017 and
that no useful purpose would be served by continuing this petition.
We appreciate his sentiments and accordingly dispose of this petition.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
FEBRUARY 09, 2017
dutt
C.S. KALRA
THE UNION OF INDIA
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
