The High Court of Delhi ordered the dismissal of a writ petition after the counsel for the petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition to pursue departmental remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Suresh Sharma, Adv.
versus
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS
..... Respondent Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R % 30.05.2017
After some submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to
withdraw the writ petition to enable the petitioner seek departmental
remedies in terms of Rules. The writ petition and connected application are
dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MAY 30, 2017 /ak
J.L. TANGORIA
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
