Disposed

Master Mayank Rawat Thro His Father and Natural Guardian Shri Harish Rawat @ Harish Chand v. Mount Abu Public School & Ors.

Delhi HC30 May 2017W.P.(C)/3436/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition challenging the timing of a compartment examination, the Court allowed an interim application for early hearing. The parties settled on conducting the exam after June 20th, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Allowed early hearing; disposed of petition on terms agreed by parties for exam after 20th June 2017.

Master Mayank Rawat Thro His Father and Natural… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2017)

¶1

$~28

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 3436/2017

¶4

MASTER MAYANK RAWAT THRO HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SHRI HARISH RAWAT @ HARISH CHAND

¶5

..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon, Adv. with Mr. Yogesh Saini, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

MOUNT ABU PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS

¶8

	..... Respondent
Through:	Mr. Kamal Gupa, Adv. for R-1
	Ms. Aayushi Gupta, Mr. Akshay
	Chaudhary, Mr. Arun Kr. Panwar,
	Advs. for R-2 & 3
	Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. for R-4/CBSE

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R

¶10

% 30.05.2017

¶11

CM No. 21547/2017

¶12

This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking early hearing of the petition. Noting the averments in the application and the learned counsel for the respondents have no objection in the hearing of the petition, the same is allowed and disposed of. Learned counsel for the parties have been heard on the writ petition.

¶13

It is the submission of Mr. Tandon, learned counsel for the petitioner

¶14

that the compartment examination conducted by the School on April 10, 2017 was contrary to the guidelines dated September 8, 2001, inasmuch as the exam has to be held in the last week of April of the concerned year. According to him, the respondent No.1 has informed the father of the petitioner only on April 01, 2017 for the appearance of the minor petitioner in the compartment examination on April 10, 2017. He states, that he did appear in the compartment examination held on April 10, 2017 but the period given, was too less for the petitioner to prepare for the same. He would rely upon the judgment of this Court in W.P.(C) no. 6709/2016 and connected petition decided on September 15, 2016 wherein this Court has in similar circumstances set aside the result of the compartment examination of the petitioners in these cases and directed the respondent to hold compartment examination for the petitioners in the concerned paper after two weeks.

¶15

Mr. Kamal Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 even though contest the submissions made by Mr. Tandon, states that without prejudice to the stand of the respondent No.1 School, the School shall conduct the compartment examination on any date convenient to the petitioner. On this submission of Mr. Gupta, Mr. Tandon states, the School

¶16

may conduct the compartment examination on any date after 20^th June, 2017. This suggestion of Mr. Tandon is agreeable to Mr. Gupta, who states that necessary communication with regard to the date and the time of the exam shall be communicated to the petitioner to enable the petitioner appear

¶17

in the compartment examination.

¶18

Mr. Gupta states, the Court may direct that no further opportunity shall be granted to the petitioner, if he does not succeed in this examination, which submission is agreeable to Mr. Tandon.

¶19

Mr. Tandon states, the aforesaid shall satisfy the petitioner and the petition be disposed of as such. The petition is disposed of. The date of hearing of 27^th July, 2017 stands cancelled.

¶20

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

¶21

MAY 30, 2017 /ak

Master Mayank Rawat Thro His Father and Natural Guardian Shri Harish Rawat @ Harish Chand v. Mount Abu Public School & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Master Mayank Rawat Thro His Father and Natural Guardian Shri Harish Rawat @ Harish Chand v. Mount Abu Public School & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Indus Towers Limited through Its Authorised Signatory Mr. Amish Mehta, Chief Financial Officer Vs Deputy Commissioiner of Income Tax, Circle 11(1) & Anr.

Strategic Credit Capital Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs Ratnakar Bank Ltd. & Ors.

Sarif College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Gaurav Singh Parmar (Minor) Vs the Central Board of Secondary Education & Ors.

Narender Kumar Sharma Vs Union of India and Ors.

Davinder Sharma Vs Delhi Development Authority

Innovision Ltd. Vs Ramgopal Singh

Sarif College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Surender Ahlawat Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Shweta Chaudhary Vs All India Institute of Medical Sciences

The Hindu Educational Trust Vs University of Delhi and Anr.

Daulat Ram College Society Vs Yogesh Tyagi & Anr.

J.L. Tangoria Vs United India Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.