The Acting Chief Justice allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and the pending application, dismissing them as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition and pending application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAKESH KUMAR & ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Farman Ali with Ms. Tamanna Goyal, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Bansal, Standing Counsel for CBSE. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonkeer with Ms. Anu K. Joy, Advs. for R-4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R
%
14.11.2017
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
NOVEMBER 14, 2017 /pmc
RAKESH KUMAR & ANR
UNION OF INDIA & ORS
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
