The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition challenging the 2014 election of the Badminton Association of India as infructuous due to a subsequent appointment in 2017 after the original appointee's death, noting that next elections are due.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
BADMINTON ASSOCIATION OF INDIA AND ORS... Respondents
Through : Mr. Nailin Kohli and Mr. Ankit Roy, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Nishant Verma, Adv. for R-6 Mr. Anil Grover, Ms. Noopur Singhal and Mr. Mishal Viz, Advs. for R- 7/NDMC Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for R-8/UOI
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
W.P.(C)No.5271/2014 Page 1 of 2
In any case, in our view, the prayers made in this writ petition have long been rendered infructuous. In view thereof, no orders are warranted and the writ petition is disposed of as such.
Dasti to parties.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
NOVEMBER 07, 2017/ kr
W.P.(C)No.5271/2014 Page 2 of 2
Dr. Surendra Poonia
Badminton Association of India
Gitta Mittal
Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
