In W.P.(C) 4073/2017, the petition prayer leave withdrew dismissed as. An adjoining exemption order allowed subject to exceptions disposed of.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
N SIVARAMAKRISHNAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Udayan Khandelwal, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Kamal Kant Jha, Sr.Panel Counsel
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R % 12.05.2017
C.M.17896/2017 (for exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 4073/2017
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
MAY 12, 2017 rb
N SIVARAMAKRISHNAN
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
VIPIN SANGHI
DEEPA SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
