This is a short order disposing of Civil Miscellaneous numbers and a Writ Petition regarding a fresh inquiry. The court allowed an exemption and held an inquiry under compliance.
The writ petition stood disposed of. Exemption allowed subject to exceptions. List of dates taken on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40.
UNION OF INDIA
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra & Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates.
versus
SALEKH CHAND SHARMA AND ANR
..... Respondents
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R
%
09.05.2017
C.M. No.17611/2017
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
C.M. No. 17612/2017
The application is allowed. List of dates is taken on record.
W.P.(C) 4005/2017 and C.M. Nos.17609-17610/2017
After some arguments, Mr. Mishra submits that the petitioner shall hold a fresh inquiry against the respondent in compliance with Rule 14 after serving the statement of imputation in respect of each of the charges.
The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Dasti.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
MAY 09, 2017 B.S. Rohella
Union of India
Salekh Chand Sharma and Anr
Vipin Sanghi
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
