The High Court of Delhi held that the petitioner's office order, which suspended the impugned transfer orders, effectively cancelled the transfer. Consequently, the writ petition became infructuous and was dismissed.
The writ petition was held to be infructuous and was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
Through: Ms. Sriparna Chatterjee, Advocate along with Mr. Soumtira Chatterjee, Advocate.
versus
NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S. Rajappa, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R
% 08.05.2017
CM No. 16237/2017 (Exemption from filing certified copies of order), CM No. 16239/2017 (for permission to file additional documents) and CM No. 16240/2017 (for exemption from filing Dim Annexures)
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 3685/2017
Issue notice. Mr. S. Rajappa, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has tendered in Court the office order dated 27.04.2017 which suspends the transfer orders of the petitioner of which the petitioner is aggrieved. Mr. S. Rajappa, on instructions, states that the said office order dated 27.04.2017 although
does not purport to cancel the impugned transfer orders but as a matter of fact, the impugned transfer order of the petitioner stands cancelled by virtue of the office order dated 27.04.2017. He states that if the respondent decides to transfer the petitioner, the fresh orders in that respect shall be issued.
In view of the aforesaid, this petition become infructuous and is therefore disposed of accordingly.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
MAY 08, 2017 ss
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition remains maintainable in light of an office order cancelling the impugned transfer.
BEE NA SHIKLA
NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI AND ORS
VIPIN SANGHI
DEEPA SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
