Writ petition challenging eviction orders from Government quarters dismissed as infructuous since the petitioner had already vacated the premises and was drawing House Rent Allowance.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous since the petitioner had already vacated the quarters.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA
O R D E R
% 07.02.2017
This writ petition is directed against the orders dated 09.11.2013, 11.05.2015 and 02.02.2016 passed by the respondents directing the petitioner to vacate the Government quarters allotted to her vide letter dated 15.06.2011.
No one has appeared in support of the writ petition today. It appears to us that the writ petition was dismissed in default by an order dated 04.05.2016. However, on an application made by the petitioner, the writ petition was restored.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the writ petition has become infructuous since the petitioner has already vacated the quarters. The quarters were vacated on 11.06.2016 and the petitioner has since been drawing House Rent Allowance.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
INDIRA BANERJEE, J
ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2017/ gm
Rup Rekha Sirohi
Union of India
Indira Banerjee
Anil Kumar Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
