Petitioner challenged provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. Respondent counsel stated the Act was in force and remedies lie before the National Company Law Tribunal. No further orders were required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
ANIL KUMAR PODDAR ..... Petitioner
Through Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr Kushal Rajtater, Advocates.
versus
EDYNAMICS SOLUTIONS LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr Kirtiman Singh, Advocate for R2,3 &6.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 05.09.2017
Learned counsel for the respondents states that the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, mentioned by the petitioner, had since been notified and are in force. He further submits that in view of the above ,the petitioner would have a remedy as available under the Companies Act before the National Company Law Tribunal.
In view of the above no further orders are required to be passed by this Court in this petition. The petition is disposed of.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SEPTEMBER 05, 2017 pkv
Anil Kumar Poddar
Edynamics Solutions Ltd.
Vibhu Bakhru
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
