An application filed seeking quashing of Shunglu Committee Report and prohibition against its reliance was disposed of when the petitioner's counsel abandoned the submissions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
M/S SIS LIVE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Rakesh Tiku, Senior Advocate with Mr Naveen Goel, Mr Rishi Bhatnagar and Mr Gaurav Kohli, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr Satya Prakash Singh, Advocate for UOI. Mr Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD with MrAkshay Agarwal, Advocate for R- 6. Mr Rajeev Sharma and Ms Radhalakshmi R. Advocates for R-7.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 05.09.2017
under:-
c) Impose costs on the Respondents;"
in strict sense, so far as proceedings for criminal action is concerned before any Court of law . However, it has also stated that the report has a persuasive value and a guiding factor for the government providing insight into the issues in question.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SEPTEMBER 05, 2017 RK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can challenge the adverse observations in the Shunglu Committee Report and seek quashing of such observations.
Whether the petitioner presses the prayers for quashing the report and passing a writ of prohibition.
M/s Sis Live
Union of India
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
