Allowed

Saurabh Gupta & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC15 Dec 2017W.P.(C)/2316/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition alleged illegal transportation of cattle violating the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and its Rules. The Court directed respondents to ensure compliance with statutory provisions, adhere to police Standing Orders, and take prompt action on complaints and registered FIRs regarding illegal cattle transport.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to ensure compliance with statutory provisions and rules; police to abide by 2010 Standing Order and take prompt action on complaints; setting up of raiding teams and issuing

Saurabh Gupta & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors. — Public Procurement and Tenders | Delhi HC (2017)

¶1

$~4

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2316/2017

¶4

% Date of Decision: 15^th December, 2017 SAURABH GUPTA & ANR. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam Tripathi, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mrs. Bharathi Rahu, CGSC for R-1 to 4. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for R-6 to 8. Mr. Pravesh Thakur, Adv. for R-9.

¶5

CORAM:

¶6

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

¶7

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

¶8

GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶9

CM No.38183/2017

¶10

For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 is condoned.

¶11

The counter affidavit be taken on record.

¶12

CM stands disposed of.

¶13

W.P.(C) No.2316/2017

¶14

This writ petition is an important issue regarding illegal transportation of cattle, which is in violation of the Rules 47 to 56 of the Transport of Animals Rules, 1978. These Rules have been

¶15

Page 1 of 5

¶16

W.P.(C) No.2316/2017

¶17

enacted in exercise of powers conferred under Section 38 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

¶18

The petitioner complains inter alia that a requisite certification from a veterinary expert is not being obtained prior to the animals being herd together in transport and moved from one place to another.

¶19

Premised inter alia on these submissions, the writ petition seeks the following prayers:

¶20

“ a) Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, direction for directing the Respondent No.2 i.e. Ministry of Home Affairs, Respondent No.4 Ministry of Food Processing Industries, Respondent No.5 i.e. Animal Welfare Board of India, Delhi for issue of notifications and guidelines to be followed by the Police Station concerned in cases of illegal Transport of Cattle reported to them.

¶21

b) Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction including Writ of Certiorari directing/issuing guidelines that the Courts of Magistrates are to follow in cases of illegal Transport of Cattle pending before them/that are reported to them.

¶22

c) Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No.1 i.e. MOEF and Respondent No.6 i.e. MOEF State and Respondent No.5 i.e. AWBI to set up a raiding team to prevent and curb illegal transport of cattle and for enforcement of Transport of Animal Rule, 1978.

¶23

Page 2 of 5

¶24

W.P.(C) No.2316/2017

¶25

d) Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writs, order, direction for directing the Respondents Union of India through the Secretary Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Ministry of Food Processing Industries Animal Welfare Board of India, Government of Delhi and NCT through the Secretary Department of Environment, Department of Home, Department of Food Safety and East Delhi Municipal Corporation for issuing guidelines to be followed by the slaughter houses and to comply strictly with such guidelines or else hold them accountable and liable in cases of failure of compliance thereof.

¶26

e) Pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of this case and in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience. ”

¶27

It cannot be denied that the issues flagged by the writ petitioner are important and that the requirement with the statutory provisions of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 as well as Rules 47 to 56 of the Transport of Animals Rules, 1978 is mandatory. No violation thereof can be countenanced.

¶28

In the counter affidavit filed by the Delhi Police, a Standing Order No.31/2010, vide No.10001-10250/RB/PHQ dated 19.10.2010 has been placed before us. This Standing Order has been issued to ensure compliance of provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

¶29

The writ petitioner has pointed out that even though the

¶30

Page 3 of 5

¶31

W.P.(C) No.2316/2017

¶32

Standing Order has been put in place and continues to bind the Delhi Police, the same is not being complied with.

¶33

The respondent No.1 to 4 – Union of India have also filed a detailed counter affidavit. A perusal thereof would show that though the reference is made to the enactment as well as the Transport of Animals Rules, 1978, these respondents have largely referred to the order dated 13^th July, 2015 passed by the Supreme Court in Gauri Maulekhi vs. Union of India [Writ Petition (Civil) No.881/2014)] regarding illegal smuggling of animals from India to Nepal.

¶34

Additionally, reference has been made to a Draft Notification No.GSR 745 (E) notifying draft rules with regard to the transportation of livestock, which was circulated as back as on 27^th October, 2014 without anything more having been undertaken. 8. The respondent No.9-East Delhi Municipal Corporation has filed the counter affidavit referring to slaughter houses and meeting held on 16^th January, 2014 with regard thereto. 9. It is evident from the above that necessary regime as well as Rules stand notified and are put in place. The Delhi Police has also issued the Standing Order as back as in the year 2010.

¶35

None of the affidavits filed before us has disclosed any aspect of compliance with the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 as well as Rules 47 to 56 of the Transport of Animals Rules, 1978 thereof.

¶36

None of the authorities have placed before us any prosecution or punitive action against even a single person for

Page 4 of 5

W.P.(C) No.2316/2017

violating the same.

To say the least, not a single instance of violation of statutory provisions has been pleaded in the counter affidavits. 10. The petitioner has placed some photographs of actual instances of violations and has also referred to twenty one First Information Reports registered by the Delhi Police.

¶41

Action on these complaints deserve to be taken.

¶42

In view of the above, it is directed that the respondents shall ensure compliance of the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 as well as Rules 47 to 56 of the Transport of Animals Rules, 1978.

¶43

The police shall abide strictly by the requirement of the Standing Order of 2010.

¶44

The respondents shall ensure very prompt action upon every complaint received regarding illegal transportation of the animals in violations of the aforesaid legal provisions including the FIRs already registered by them.

¶45

This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶46

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶47

C.HARI SHANKAR, J

¶48

DECEMBER 15, 2017 /pmc

¶49

Page 5 of 5

¶50

W.P.(C) No.2316/2017

Saurabh Gupta & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saurabh Gupta & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mgt.of M/S.Chandra Auto Engg.P.Ltd. Vs Rahmat Ali Zahini & Others

Dharam Veer Singh Vs Presiding Officer,D.T.C.

Vijay Bank Vs Ish Kumar Pruthi & Anr.

Munni Vs Union of India & Ors.

Kaptan Singh Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Vipin Chugh Vs Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.

V.K. Mittal Vs the Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Preeti Verma Vs State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi & Ors.

Mohinder Kumar Vs Board of Governors in Super-Session of Medical Council of India

Baba Firozuddin Vs State of Delhi and Ors.

Rajpal Mavi Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ashmeen Vs Department of Women and Child Development and Anr.

Lal Babu Lalit Vs Bar Council of India & Ors.

Birender Sangwan Vs L. G. of Delhi and Ors.