Petitioner sought direction to implement the Clinical Establishments Act, 2010. Government counsel responded with a notice meeting plan, leading withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BIRENDER SANGWAN ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Joginder Sukhija, Mr. Birender Sangwan and Mr. Neeraj Kant Singh, Advs.
versus
L. G. OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASCGNCTD with Ms. Mahamaya Banerjee, Adv. and Mr. Ankit Kumar, Legal Asstt. (H&FW Deptt.)
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R
% 15.12.2017
Page 1 of 2
implementation of the provisions of this enactment. Inasmuch as the respondents are concerned with the need to implement the said legislation, this writ petition in our view does not call for any orders from us.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
DECEMBER 15, 2017/ kr
Page 2 of 2
Birender Sangwan
L. G. of Delhi
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
