The High Court disposed of the writ petitions as not pressed but granted liberty to the petitioner/school to initiate departmental proceedings against respondents found ineligible for appointment.
Liberty granted to the petitioner/school to initiate departmental proceedings against respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
versus
PINKY &ANR , Through: Mr. R.A. Iyer, Advocate for R-2.
VIDYA BHARTI SCHOOL Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Bandhu, Advocate.
versus
^
URMILA&ANR Respondent Through: Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, ASC for DOE.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA
ORDER
0/„ 06.03.2017
criteria for appointment to the petitionei/school.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
MARCH 06, 2017
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions should be dismissed or disposed of.
Whether liberty should be granted to the petitioner to initiate departmental proceedings.
Whether to allow the petitioner/school to initiate departmental proceedings against employees lacking eligibility criteria.
VIDYA BHARTI SCHOOL
URMILA & ANR
PINKY & ANR
Valmikij. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
