The court disposed of writ petitions not pressed by granting liberty to the petitioner school to initiate departmental proceedings against respondents alleged to lack appointment eligibility.
Liberty granted to the petitioner/school to initiate departmental proceedings against the employees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
versus
PINKY &ANR , Through: Mr. R.A. Iyer, Advocate for R-2.
VIDYA BHARTI SCHOOL Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Bandhu, Advocate.
versus
^
URMILA&ANR Respondent Through: Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, ASC for DOE.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA
ORDER
0/„ 06.03.2017
criteria for appointment to the petitionei/school.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
MARCH 06, 2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the school can be granted liberty to initiate departmental proceedings against employees for lack of eligibility.
Vidya Bharti School
Urmila & Anr.
Valmikij. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
