Rohit @ Bhagwan Dass v. North Delhi Municipal Corp. & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
ROHIT @ BHAGWAN DASS
Through None.
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORP. & ORS
..... Respondents Through Mr.G.D.Mishra, Adv. for R-1 and R-2/North DMC with Mr.A.V. Sharma, A.E.(Bld.).
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 10.03.2017
Petitioner by way of this petition appears to be aggrieved by the illegal and unauthorised construction raised by the private respondent over property bearing No.3886-87, Pul Bangash (in front) Metro Station, Main Road, Roshanara Road, Delhi.
On the last date counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2 had put in appearance. He had accepted the notice. On instructions he informs this Court today that the aforenoted properties are in fact two shops adjacent to one another; they are old shops. No constructions activity was found at the site. No illegal deviations have also been noted. He further points out that there appears to be illegal deviations on first, second and third floors of the property; the present petition does not belong to those properties. Those deviations have been booked and
necessary action will be taken qua those properties. It is reiterated that those properties are not the subject matter of the present petition.
Since none has appeared for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed in default as also on merits as nothing survives in this petition.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
MARCH 10, 2017 ndn
ROHIT @ BHAGWAN DASS
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORP.
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court