This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Rajshekar Rao and Mr. Sameer Dawar, Advocates.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents
Through Ms.Eshita Baruah for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for SDMC/R-1 Mr.Ajjay Arora, Mr.Kapil Dutta and Ms.Diksha Lal, Advocates for North DMC and EDMC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
Learned counsel for SDMC states that the approval from the Competent Authority will most likely be obtained by the end of the month and action in terms of the directions contained in the order dated 16.01.2017 shall be implemented.
Learned counsel appearing for EDMC and North DMC states that the averments made in the present petition shall be treated as a positive representation on behalf of the petitioner and the same shall be answered in accordance with law; the properties will be de-sealed to enable the petitioner to dismantle/remove the tower/accessories whenever need be within a time bound frame to be fixed by the
Competent Authority/respondent. This action shall be completed by the Corporation within an outer limit of 8 weeks.
Petition disposed of.
Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
MARCH 09, 2017 ndn
ATC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
