The court dismissed the writ petition following the withdrawal made by the petitioner's counsel with a liberty to approach the pending application under the National Green Tribunal concerning substantially similar issues of fact and law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
SRIDHAR KOTAGIRI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam Tripathi, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajul Jain with Mr. Anukalp Jain and Ms. Adrija Thakur, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 11.12.2017
W.P.(C) No.1715/2017
Pg.1 of 2
Dasti .
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
DECEMBER 11, 2017 /pmc
Pg.2 of 2
W.P.(C) No.1715/2017
Sridhar Kotagiri
Union of India
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
