The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition and connected application. The court granted the prayer and dismissed the matter as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition and application granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
VINOD KUMAR AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through : Mr. Sushil Kr. Jain, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Shyam Sunder Rai, Adv. for R-1
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 08.12.2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw this petition and application. The same are dismissed as withdrawn.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
DECEMBER 08, 2017/ kr
Vinod Kumar
Union of India
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
