In this short order, the Court disposed of a writ petition filed seeking the disposal of the petitioner's file by the respondent authorities. The petition was disposed of in accordance with the assurance given by the respondent counsel regarding the timeline for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Adv.
versus
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING AND ANR
..... Respondents Through Mr. C.M. Goyal, C.G.Sr. C. for R-1. Mr. Amit Kumar for Mr. Vikas Chopra, Adv for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
% 12.07.2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the file of the petitioner is lying with respondent No.2. Counsel for respondent No.2 points out that all applications of such like petitioners are being considered and they shall be dealt with on or before 30.07.2017. After the same has been considered by respondent No.2, the same shall be forwarded as per procedure to respondent No.1 who shall then expedite the proposal.
Petition disposed of in the above terms.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JULY 12, 2017 A
Charotar Gas Private Industrial Training Centre
Directorate General of Training
Vikas Chopra
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
